Skip to main content

Feeling Your Way to Error

A belief based on emotion isn't necessarily wrong. You could conclude, for example, based upon nothing but a personal feeling, that it's morally wrong to take food from starving orphans, and you would be absolutely right. However, emotional thinking as a system for arriving at truth has a number of pitfalls that become more problematic the longer a person lingers on that path.

It often overlooks a greater good in favor of immediate results. For example, I don't want to see my child experiencing emotional pain, so I jump in to solve all of her interpersonal problems, and she never learns to solve problems on her own.

It often refuses to accept hard truths. For example, a friend dies in a car accident because she couldn't get her seatbelt unfastened fast enough. It was a million to one situation with no equipment malfunctions. Does that mean that seatbelts are bad and that someone should be prosecuted? No, but it does mean that for the multitudes of people that safety devices protect, there will likely always be a small number of people that they actually hurt, and we make many such trade-offs in our society.

It often overlooks nuance in complex ideas and situations. An example of this is the famous McDonalds coffee lawsuit that asserted that the company should have taken action in light of receiving over 700 complaints about the heat of its coffee. Emotional thinkers jumped in and condemned the heartless company that did nothing while it scalded hundreds of its customers. But they didn't consider the fact that McDonald's sells over 1 Billion cups of coffee in a year, so those 700 complaints made up 0.00007% of their total coffee sales, an incredibly insignificant number undeserving of drastic action by the company.

It removes the one reliable method(reasoning from facts) for a person to improve the accuracy of his belief system. Emotion is by nature self-preserving. It doesn't want to be changed. That's why facts and reason tend to land on emotion like vinegar with baking soda. Emotional thinkers tend to demonize critics while reinterpreting facts and experience as necessary to keep their assumptions afloat.

Emotional thinking misuses facts. Even emotional thinkers realize that in order to be taken seriously, they have to present something resembling an argument to support their view. However, emotional thinkers don't go where the facts lead, they cherry-pick facts to support their emotions, and if none can be found, they use fallacies to cram them in where they don't fit. They depend on echo-chambers and like-minded individuals to keep telling them their conclusions are correct.

Emotional thinking is not a failure of intelligence, but of training. It needs to be unlearned like any bad habit. As a society, we need to purposely cultivate an intellectual character that doesn't tolerate shoddy thinking. We don't (as one person told me) "temper our emotions with reason." We restrain our emotions when necessary and develop an appetite for the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Why Don't I Talk More About Revelation?

There is a reason that I don't spend a lot of time talking about the Book of Revelation. Because, for whatever reason, people will thrust aside or trample scores of clear, concise, and unmistakable Biblical principles and passages, scrambling to pin down some obscure interpretation of Revelation.

Revelation is God's word. We should treat it as such, by reading and attempting to understand it. However, end times discussions themselves tend to have a lot in common with politics. Once the topic comes up, it steamrolls everything else, people start spouting more unsubstantiated opinions than can be counted, and no one really learns anything of real value.

We could put it this way. There are 31,102 verses in the entire Bible. There are 404 verses in Revelation. That means that Revelation makes up a little over 1% of the Bible.

Clearly, it would be reaching too far to suggest that a dogmatic formula for connecting the size of a book and the time a Christians spends in it. However, i…

The Many Dangers of "Woke" Christianity

If you ever want a reason to question your faith in humanity, read the comments section of a controversial news story. For me, it is most difficult to read the comments that come from people arguing for a position with which I agree, but in all the most mean-spirited, unhelpful and generally idiotic ways.
Granted, comments sections generally draw in all the Internet's cousin Eddy's like a porch-light brings in moths at night, nevertheless, it forces me, and I imagine many other Christians to fight the urge to shout to anyone who will listen that "We aren't like those Christians."
I think this instinct is part of the draw of "woke" Christianity, which recasts Christianity into primarily a social justice philosophy. I think it comes from a not-so-wrong desire for a kinder gentler Christianity more preoccupied with meeting the needs of the hurting, than with shouting opinions through bull-horns on the street corner.
But, here be dragons. Progressive, or "…

Wrong Arguments on the Right Side

“I strongly object to wrong arguments on the right side. I think I object to them more than to the wrong arguments on the wrong side.”  - G. K. ChestertonIn an observation that surprises no one who is paying attention, it turns out that today's Evangelical Christianity not only tolerates many wrong arguments, but often embraces and celebrates them. Yet, the one who dares to point them out risks the intense enmenty of members of the Evangelical/Conservative tribe. I will save you the particulars of the incident that most recently and painfully reemphasized this truth in my own life, but it is a problem that threatens to undermine the integrity of any ideology or movement. 
As Christians, we should select our arguments with the discriminating taste of a fine chef choosing ingredients for her signature dish. We don't choose ones that are "probably okay" or "good enough." We ought to choose only the best and reject the others, while abandoning any previously h…