Skip to main content

Impressions of the Shapiro-MacArthur Interview


I finally got around to listening to John MacArthur and Ben Shapiro’s discussion on Shapiro’s show from a couple of weeks ago, and I have to say that I am quite impressed. It is a discussion worth hearing, and I won’t rehash the entire thing, but you can go and listen to them here.

Photo by Daniel McCullough on Unsplash
There are a couple of points upon which I differ slightly from MacArthur:
First, I applaud his willingness to raise the question of whether the American Revolution was something Christians ought to have supported. I think it is an important discussion to have if for no other reason but that it encourages the politically-obsessed religious right to reconsider its eagerness to endorse wars and rebellion. Clearly, Christians should not be involved in revolts against the government, but to remain submissive to civil authority which God has ordained.

However, the American Revolution wasn’t really a revolution. It was a war waged by local governments against the government of Great Britain, rather than citizens revolting against their own government. That is one reason that the American War for Independence (a preferable description, in my opinion), was not subject to the same upheaval and atrocities that, for example, typified the French Revolution. So, it seems to me that when evaluating the morality of the American War for Independence, we should consider it under that nuanced understanding.

Finally, I think that MacArthur’s observation that the president is not a position of moral authority is factually accurate, but practically hazy. That fact has been played out in the American evangelical community as staunch Trump supporters have defended so much of his bizarre, uncouth, and immoral behavior. (And that’s just what he’s done since being in office) If Trump had been elected for utilitarian reasons, and his defenders maintained that utilitarian mindset, then there would be no problem. However, the sad reality is that evangelical Christians have become ever more like Trump in their eagerness to defend him, and thereby defend their own decision to support him in the 2016 election. They have consistently spiritualized their choice, depicting Trump as a savior, and asserting that he is a born again Christian. Regardless of what it should be, the character of the President has always had a measurable effect upon the character of the people of the nation – a fact that no evangelical would have disputed during the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal of the 90’s. For that reason, I think it is safe to say that while history will decide whether Trump’s presidency will be good for the nation, it has clearly been bad for the religious right up to this point. We should take note of this for future elections.


Popular posts from this blog

John Crist Demonstrates the Poor Thinking Skills of Modern Christians

In a recent rant on Instagram , Christian comedian John Crist demonstrated just how bad modern Christians can be at critical thought. Now, to be honest with you, I had no idea who John Crist was until about 5 minutes ago, though a quick check of YouTube showed some of his comedy to be marginally entertaining. But perhaps he should stick with entertaining rather than trying to lecture believers on matters of substance. The subject of Crist’s rant was the criticism Lauren Daigle has received regarding her failure , when questioned, to communicate the clear teaching of Scripture on the issue of homosexuality. There is no doubt that Daigle is wrong. Perhaps she is merely Scripturally illiterate, or she is capitulating to maintain her popularity, but she is wrong. In her interview with radio host Domenick Nati, she repeats the error that so many Christians have accepted – the conclusion that if I get to know someone living in immorality, and they don’t seem like a terrible person, the

20 Years After Columbine: Who do we believe in?

20 years ago today, two dark-hearted young men entered the campus of Columbine High School with the goal of bringing pain and death to as many people as possible. I was 15 at the time, and this is one of the first national events that caught my attention. It left an indelible mark on my life. Shortly after the events of the day, stories began to come out that at least two of the students who were killed were Christians, perhaps targeted for their beliefs by the killers. Eyewitness accounts say that both Cassie Bernall, and Rachel Scott were questioned about their belief in God before they were murdered. These stories of martyrdom struck me heavily - a young person my age who, when asked with a gun pointed at her, affirmed that she believed in God. I wondered if I had the same courage. I was challenged to think about the sort of life I should live. As is often the case with such things, as the investigation began to unfold, more information came forward that threw into question the ma

This Post Isn't About Coronavirus (I promise)

I don't like being told what to do. Or, more precisely, I don't like the way it feels having someone make decisions for me which I think I should be able to make for myself. As you can imagine, the last six months have been a difficult pill to swallow. Let me be blunt: I hate it all.  I hate the stupid masks and the dumb face shields. I particularly hate it when people post pictures and videos on social media of themselves wearing them. It always seems to me that they are either virtue signaling or acquiescing to the "new norm" which makes me want to shout at the top of my lungs "Why would anyone want to normalize this?!"  (Hang on, remember, this post isn't about the virus.) I'm done with all of it. I never want to hear the term "social distancing" again in my life. I'm tired of re-ingesting my own breath-flavored-carbon-dioxide-laced air every time I leave the house while reliving every time my older siblings thought it would be funny